Use 2 theories (listed) to creat an argument to use each theory as a tool for analyzing an IGO (anyone, except for the 5 listed) and compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about the IGO.

Use 2 theories (listed) to creat an argument to use each theory as a tool for analyzing an IGO (anyone, except for the 5 listed) and compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about the IGO.

A clear thesis statement and argument with use of examples to support the analysis. 2. All references cited in Chicago/Turabian format,including page numbers. 3. APA formant, no fewer than 7 and no more than 10 pages (double spaced), 12 pt font. 4. Only use references I have provided within the paper. 5. Detail instructions: The paper is expected to be an Analytical Graduate Research Paper/Literature Review, I need a formulated argument/thesis. Then I want to use the methodology to explain the thesis, analyze the content (from the sources). And the evidence to support the thesis, why the argument is valid. This paper is about analyzing 2 of these theories of socialization, and or realism, and neoliberal institutionalism then applying to a International Governmental Organization. Additionally, use each one as a tool for analyzing the IGO and to compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about this IGO. Bulk of instruction: Use two theories of the listed theories and apply each theory to an IGO of your choice (except for UN, WHO, UNOCH, IMF, PAHO) to use each theory as a tool for analyzing the IGO and to compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about this IGO. The Theories are: Socialization (which falls under constructivism), Realism (as discussed by Mearsheimer), and Neoliberal institutionalism (as discussed in Haftel and Thompson (2006) Additional instructions: * The goal is not to identify which one is “best” or “right,” but to use two theories as a tool for analyzing the IGO and to compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about this IGO. *Do not conduct outside research, but use as many of the class readings as you can (I have attached these in the bibliography list). * The goal of the instructor is to synthesize our readings and show that I comprehended them. Construction of the paper must encompass the following: Outline Intro/thesis (research question/argument) Literature Review Methodology Explanation Evidence Analysis section Qualifier Caveats Conclusion Exact instructions from the course, “For the final assignment, you will address the following question: Over the last weeks we encountered several IR theories. Let’s consider a sampling of three: socialization (which falls under constructivism), realism (as discussed by Mearsheimer), and neoliberal institutionalism (as discussed in Haftel and Thompson (2006), for example, or Hurd’s introduction, which is attached. This is not an exhaustive list of the readings to use). Your objective is to take two theories of your choice and apply each theory to an IGO of your choice (not the same one you analyzed in your research paper). The goal is not to identify which one is “best” or “right,” but to use each one as a tool for analyzing the IGO and to compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about this IGO. Do not conduct outside research, but use as many of the class readings as you can. The goal is to synthesize your readings and show that you’ve completed and comprehended them. Also, do not recycle content from forums or your research paper; the essay should be a new composition. To address the question, compose an essay of no fewer than 7 and no more than 10 pages (double spaced). You do not need to conduct outside research and should concentrate on using the course readings to display that you’ve completed them and understand their general arguments. All references must be cited in Chicago/Turabian format, which means including page numbers. Be sure to make a clear thesis statement and argument and use examples to support your analysis. Good luck! Reminder: All assignments should be written in Word and uploaded as attachments within the Assignments section of the classroom. Use 12 pt. font and double-space. Be sure to put your name and class information on the document and put your name on the file. Insert page numbers. Assignments will be graded using a rubric appropriate for your class level. References to use: Bibliography/Reading List Baylis, John. 2010. International and global security. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, ed. John Baylis, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, 230-245. Benjamin, Dave. 2009. “PROTECTING THE PROTECTORS: NGO ACTION AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT.”. International Journal on World Peace 26, no. 1: 31-50, https://search.proquest.com/docview/219267315?accountid=8289. Copelovitch, Mark S. 2010. “Master or Servant? Common Agency and the Political Economy of IMF Lending.” International Studies Quarterly 54, no. 1: 49-77. International Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center, EBSCOhost (accessed December 13, 2015). Grant, Ruth, and Robert Keohane. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99, no. 1 (2005). https://www.jstor.org.ezproxy1.apus.edu/stable/pdf/30038917.pdf?acceptTC=true. Greenhill, Brian. 2010. The company you keep: International socialization and the diffusion of human rights norms.International Studies Quarterly 54/1: 127-145. EBSCO: https://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=48465581&site=ehost-live. Haftel, Yoram, and Alexander Thompson. “The Independence of International Organizations.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 50, no. 2 (2006). https://www.jstor.org.ezproxy1.apus.edu/stable/pdf/27638486.pdf?acceptTC=true. Hathaway, Oona A. 2007. “Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (4). Sage Publications, Inc.: 588–621. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27638567. Iriye, Akira. 2002. Global Community: The Role of International Organizations in the Making of the Contemporary World. Berkeley, CA,