Leadership Model Analysis Scoring Guide

Leadership Model Analysis Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 10.
Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.
CRITERIA
NONPERFORMANCE
BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Compare and
contrast three
leadership models
relevant to your
current or future
professional field.
20%
Does not
compare and
contrast
leadership
models.
Discusses leadership
models, but does not
compare and contrast them
including how models are
similar or different and how
they support or contradict
each other.
Compares and
contrasts three
leadership models
relevant to your
current or future
professional field.
Compares and contrasts
three leadership models
relevant to your current
or future professional
field, and includes
examples of application
for each.
Analyze each
model’s development
and its relative
effectiveness.
10%
Does not analyze
each model’s
development or
effectiveness.
Discusses each model’s
development and its
relative effectiveness, but
does not analyze
development or
effectiveness.
Analyzes each
model’s development
and its relative
effectiveness.
Analyzes each model’s
development and its
relative effectiveness
and provides examples
of environments where
each model would work.
Identify how the
chosen models are
similar or different
and how they
support or contradict
each other.
10%
Does not identify
how the chosen
models are
similar or different
or how they
support or
contradict each
other.
Identifies how the chosen
models are similar or
different, or identifies how
they support or contradict
each other, but does not do
both.
Identifies how the
chosen models are
similar or different
and how they
support or contradict
each other.
Identifies how the
chosen models are
similar or different and
how they support or
contradict each other,
and includes examples
of application for each.
Analyze how
leadership within
each model could
influence an
organizational
problem or issue
within your current
or future
professional field.
20%
Does not analyze
how leadership
within each
model could
influence an
organizational
problem or issue
within your
current or future
professional field.
Discusses an
organizational problem but
does not analyze how each
of the three models could
influence interpreting and
approaching the problem.
Analyzes how
leadership within
each model could
influence an
organizational
problem or issue
within your current or
future professional
field.
Analyzes how each of
the three models could
influence interpreting
and approaching an
organizational problem
giving specific examples
in each case.
Demonstrate written
communication that
is professional and
scholarly, with main
and supporting
points substantiated
using APA format for
citations and
references.
20%
Does not
demonstrate
written
communication
that is
professional and
scholarly, with
main and
supporting points
substantiated
using APA format
for citations and
references.
Inconsistently
demonstrates written
communication that is
professional and scholarly,
with main and supporting
points occasionally
supported with scholarly
evidence and are
sometimes substantiated
using APA format for
citations and references;
the language, mechanics,
paragraph development,
and manuscript
organization detract from
clarity and meaning; the
frequency of style and
Demonstrates written
communication that
is professional and
scholarly, with main
and supporting
points substantiated
using APA format for
citations and
references;
arguments are
generally supported
with scholarly
evidence; the
language,
mechanics,
paragraph
development, and
Demonstrates excellent
written communication
that is professional and
scholarly, with main and
supporting points
substantiated using APA
format for citations and
references; arguments
are consistently
supported with scholarly
evidence; the language,
mechanics, paragraph
development, and
manuscript organization
enhance clarity and
meaning; there are no
style and formatting
formatting errors detract
from the strength of writing;
ideas are not consistently
logical and succinct.
manuscript
organization
contribute to clarity
and meaning; ideas
are generally logical
and succinct.
errors and the ideas are
consistently logical and
succinct.
Evaluate
methodological
approaches to
leadership research
related to each of
these models.
10%
Does not
evaluate
methodological
approaches to
leadership
research related
to each of these
models.
Describes methodological
approaches to leadership
research, or evaluates, but
not for all three models.
Evaluates
methodological
approaches to
leadership research
related to each of
these models.
Evaluates
methodological
approaches to
leadership theory and
model development as
well as how this applies
to research on
leadership issues and
problems in the field.
Make
recommendations
for future research to
expand upon or
develop new
leadership models.
10%
Does not make
recommendations
for future
research to
expand upon or
develop new
leadership
models.
Briefly discusses
recommendations for future
research but does not
address development of
new leadership models.
Makes
recommendations for
future research to
expand upon or
develop new
leadership models.
Provides substantiated
rationale for
recommendations for
future research to
expand upon or develop
new leadership models