STATE MAPLES & CO’S RESPONSIBILITIES IN RELATION TO THE PREVENTION AND DETECTION OF FRAUD AND ERROR.

STATE MAPLES & CO’S RESPONSIBILITIES IN RELATION TO THE PREVENTION AND DETECTION OF FRAUD AND ERROR.

State Maples & Co’s responsibilities in relation to the prevention and detection of fraud and error.

5 You are the audit supervisor of Maple & Co and are currently planning the audit of an existing client, Sycamore Science
Co (Sycamore), whose year end was 30 April 2015. Sycamore is a pharmaceutical company, which manufactures
and supplies a wide range of medical supplies. The draft financial statements show revenue of $35·6 million and
profit before tax of $5·9 million.
Sycamore’s previous finance director left the company in December 2014 after it was discovered that he had been
claiming fraudulent expenses from the company for a significant period of time. A new finance director was appointed
in January 2015 who was previously a financial controller of a bank, and she has expressed surprise that Maple &
Co had not uncovered the fraud during last year’s audit.
During the year Sycamore has spent $1·8 million on developing several new products. These projects are at different
stages of development and the draft financial statements show the full amount of $1·8 million within intangible
assets. In order to fund this development, $2·0 million was borrowed from the bank and is due for repayment over a
ten-year period. The bank has attached minimum profit targets as part of the loan covenants.
The new finance director has informed the audit partner that since the year end there has been an increased number
of sales returns and that in the month of May over $0·5 million of goods sold in April were returned.
Maple & Co attended the year-end inventory count at Sycamore’s warehouse. The auditor present raised concerns that
during the count there were movements of goods in and out the warehouse and this process did not seem well
controlled.
During the year, a review of plant and equipment in the factory was undertaken and surplus plant was sold, resulting
in a profit on disposal of $210,000.
Required:
(a) State Maples & Co’s responsibilities in relation to the prevention and detection of fraud and error.
(4 marks)
(b) Describe SIX audit risks, and explain the auditor’s response to each risk, in planning the audit of Sycamore
Science Co. (12 marks)
(c) Sycamore’s new finance director has read about review engagements and is interested in the possibility of Maple
& Co undertaking these in the future. However, she is unsure how these engagements differ from an external
audit and how much assurance would be gained from this type of engagement.
Required:
(i) Explain the purpose of review engagements and how these differ from external audits; and (2 marks)
(ii) Describe the level of assurance provided by external audits and review engagements. (2 marks)
(20 marks)

---

 

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH AMAZON PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

STATE MAPLES & CO’S RESPONSIBILITIES IN RELATION TO THE PREVENTION AND DETECTION OF FRAUD AND ERROR. essay Wise Papers.