Why is it that democracies are more receptive or more favorable to terrorist attacks than theocracies, autocracies, or dictatorship style governments? Custom Essay

Why is it that democracies are more receptive or more favorable to terrorist attacks than theocracies, autocracies, or dictatorship style governments? Custom Essay

The first page of the essay should address: On page 159 of your textbook, White (2012) initiates a discussion about the roots of modern terrorism. During his discussion, White (2012, p. 162) states The Enlightenment and the birth of democracy give rise to two paradoxes. The first deals with the relationship between democracy and terrorism. F. Gregory Gause III (2005) points to a variety of studies about this relationship, and he comes to a depressing conclusion. Terrorist attacks occur more frequently in democracies than in countries with any other form of government.�

With this statement in mind, please address the following questions:

Why is it that democracies are more receptive or more favorable to terrorist attacks than theocracies, autocracies, or dictatorship style governments? What specific elements of a democracy allow terrorists or extremists to collaborate, plan, and execute attacks on the very country in which they are operating?
What specific challenges does this mean to a democratic government? How does democratic government control and mitigate the effects of terrorism without becoming a repressive entity focusing on strictly monitoring and punishing behavior of its citizens?
Does the fact that democracies are more favorable to terrorism mean that the United States is faced with an endless future of extremist and terrorist attacks? Why or why not?

The second page should address:TERRORISM, WAR, AND TACTICS:

In chapter 5, White (2012) discusses the concepts of gender roles, tactics, and force multipliers as they are used in terrorism. This particular discussion will focus on tactics as they have developed and transformed in recent years and decades.

During this chapter, White (2012) compares terrorist tactics to the tactics of the military. Using the information from this chapter, compare and contrast the military with terrorist organizations. How is terrorism different from war? What are the objectives of war versus those of terrorism (consider this both in the general sense and specifically as it relates to our current conflict with extremism of all ideologies)? Are the actions of war dynamically different from those that can be found in terrorist plots and incidents? What are some of the similarities differences in the weapons that are used in terrorism versus war? And finally, is it appropriate to call our current conflict the war on terror? Why or why not?